• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

green power mobility reviews Mobility and Safety Concerns

Power mobility enhances participation in daily activities and recreation for those in long term care. The devices can also pose security concerns that need to be addressed.

Most participants chose to take a teleological approach and give all residents the chance to test devices, not to exclude residents with specific diagnoses which could be considered a risk management decision that is prejudicial.

Mobility

A power green mobility device provides an option for those with limited mobility to move around their home or community and also to take part in activities of daily living that they may not be able to perform. These devices could cause danger not only to the person using them, but also to those who share their space or surroundings. Occupational therapists must carefully assess the safety needs of each client prior to making recommendations on powered mobility.

In an exploratory study (von Zweck 1999), OTs from three residential care facilities within the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority conducted qualitative interviews with residents regarding their green power mobility mobility use. The aim was to develop an environment that allowed for a client-centered power movement prescription. The results revealed four major themes: (1) power mobility meaning, (2) learning road rules, (3) red flags safety concerns and (4) solutions.

Power mobility can dramatically improve the quality of life for individuals with limited mobility by giving them the opportunity to participate in a range of daily living activities at home as well as in the community (Brandt 2001; Evans, 2000). Participation in self-care or leisure activities, as well as productive ones is essential for physical and mental health for older adults, and for many people with chronic illnesses power mobility is the opportunity to keep participating in these vital activities.

The majority of participants felt it was unacceptable to take away the chair of a resident, since this would cause a major disruption in their life story or trajectory and essentially prevent them from continuing with the same activities they had been doing before their illness progressed. This was especially the case for those in the Facility 1, who had been capable of maintaining their power chairs for brief durations and were forced to rely on other residents to push them around the facility.

Another option is to reduce the speed that some residents drive their chairs. However, this could raise several issues, including privacy and the impact on the rest of the community. The most drastic solution to safety concerns was to remove a resident's wheelchair.

Safety

Power mobility allows people to move around more freely. They can also participate in a greater variety of activities and do around on their own. With the increased mobility comes an increased risk of accidents. These accidents can cause serious injuries for some. This is why it is vital to consider the security of your client before recommending that they use a power mobility.

First check if your client is able to safely operate their scooter or power chair. This could include an assessment of physical health by a doctor or occupational therapist or a greenpower mobility specialist, based on the nature of your client's impairment and their current health. In certain situations your client may require a lift for their vehicle to be capable of loading and unloading the mobility device at their home, community or workplace.

Another aspect of safety is learning the rules of the road. This includes sharing space with other pedestrians, other wheelchair users and drivers of cars, trucks or buses. Most participants in the study discussed this topic.

For some, this meant learning to use their wheelchairs on sidewalks, instead of driving through busy areas or over curbs (unless specifically designed for doing so). Others drove slower and paid attention to pedestrians in an area that was crowded.

The final and least popular option that was to take away the wheelchair of a person, was seen as a double whammy: losing independence in mobility, and also preventing the person from participating in the activities of the community and facilities. This was the viewpoint of the majority of those who had their chairs removed and included Diane and Harriet.

Other suggestions made by participants included educating residents as well as family members and staff on the proper operation of green power scooter mobility. This could involve teaching the basics of driving (such as driving on the right side of the hallway) and encouraging residents to practice driving techniques when they go out and helping them understand how their actions can affect the mobility of others.

Follow-Up

The capacity and willingness of a child to be a part of the world can be greatly affected by a power mobility device. However, very little research has been done on the experience of children learning to use this device. This study uses a post-previous design to examine the effects of six months of use with one of four early mobility devices on a group of school-aged children of children suffering from severe cerebral palsy (CP).

We conducted qualitative interviews with 15 parents, and also pediatric occupational and physical therapists. Thematic analysis revealed three key themes. The first theme, 'Power to move explained the ways that using a powered device affected more than just the child's locomotor abilities. The experience of learning to drive a motorized mobility device is usually an emotional and transformative one.

The second theme, 'There isn't a recipe book,' showed that learning to utilize a power mobility device was a bespoke process that evolved over time in a cyclical fashion. Therapists were required to discover what was appropriate for each child's needs and abilities. Throughout the training and post-training phases, therapists were expected to be patient with parents and children. Parents and therapists alike described the need to help families celebrate their accomplishments and address issues related to the process of training.

The third theme, "Shared space", examined how the use of an electric device can affect other people's interactions and lives. The majority of participants in this study believed that people should be mindful when using a power device. This is particularly true when driving in public spaces. Participants also said that they had seen situations in which property belonging to someone else was damaged due to the use of a power mobility device or an individual had suffered injuries from a driver who failed to yield the right of way.

The results of this study show that socialization and power mobility training for preschoolers with CP can be conducted in certain classroom environments. Future research should be focused on the effectiveness of training and outcomes of this kind of intervention with young children with CP. This will hopefully lead more standard training protocols for children suffering from CP.