• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

U.S. regulators have gone after Binance before. If you have a key tree with a million combinations, now for each of those million combinations you would need to do elliptic curve cryptography to derive what the leaf is because each of them would need an individual multiplier. Signatures right now contain the actual ECDSA signature with concatenated to it the sighash type. That is only where we have one type of sighash? To break this scenario an attacker has to be able to choose their own key and not pick one from the set. So now an attacker cannot invent any key in this scheme anymore because any key being added to the scheme would change this commitment and break the linearity property that you could use to derive. This would be a huge advantage for larger multisig constructions which are very expensive and large right now in Bitcoin. CHECKSIGVERIFY from now on means Schnorr CHECKSIGVERIFY.

This means it is not subject to government regulations when traded or spent, and you don't need a bank to use it. In particular if you had an algorithm to figure out what the resulting private key after cancellation was under 2 user scenario you could use the same algorithm to break Schnorr signatures themselves. There is a really cute algorithm called Wagner’s algorithm which would completely break this in no time. Then there are the internal explanatory videos. If you found here, you are probably thinking about donating some bucks for simply click the up coming post development of your favorite keyboard launcher